Citizens Property Insurance Board Approves Rate Hike

TALLAHASSEE (CBSMiami/NSF) – Customers of Citizens Property Insurance Corp. are getting a bigger complaint hike than was initially proposed, owed to a alteration successful a authorities instrumentality that was partially blocked by a national justice this week.

Citizens officials expressed disappointment successful Sunday’s ruling, successful which Chief U.S. District Judge Mark Walker recovered that the caller law, approved by legislators this spring, violated code rights of roofing contractors.

READ MORE: Accused Parkland Shooter Nikolas Cruz Makes First Court Appearance Since Before Pandemic

But the Citizens committee of directors took vantage of different portion of the measurement (SB 76) to o.k. caller complaint changes during a gathering connected Wednesday.

“These indispensable adjustments bespeak the efforts of the Florida Legislature to instrumentality Citizens to its relation arsenic a residual security company,” Citizens Chairman Carlos Beruff said successful a property merchandise pursuing Wednesday’s action. “Unfortunately, we person go the archetypal choice, oregon lone choice, successful excessively galore regions of the state.”

Described arsenic a modification of increases antecedently approved successful February, the changes mean the mean complaint summation for caller and renewing policies aft August 1 volition beryllium 2.3 percent, portion renewals aft Feb. 1, 2022 are going up 7.6 percent.

The increases alteration by determination and inactive necessitate support from the Office of Insurance Regulation.

The caller statute, which went into effect July 1, successful portion altered a 2011 instrumentality that capped yearly increases for Citizens customers astatine 10 percent, which means that galore haven’t been paying actuarially dependable rates.

The law, signed by Gov. Ron DeSantis past month, besides allows Citizens to origin successful further reinsurance outgo estimates erstwhile calculating rates.

Brandon-based Gale Force Roofing & Restoration LLC past period filed a suit challenging the caller statute, arguing that a proviso prohibiting roofing contractors from advertizing is unconstitutional.

Siding with the roofing company, Walker issued a preliminary injunction blocking portions of the instrumentality from being enforced. The justice recovered that the caller instrumentality violates First Amendment rights by straight penalizing protected speech.

Walker’s ruling focused connected a portion of the instrumentality that prevents contractors from soliciting homeowners to record security claims done a “prohibited advertisement,” which could see specified things arsenic emails, doorway hangers, flyers and pamphlets.

“It is besides wide that the threatened injuries to plaintiff from banning plaintiff’s truthful commercialized code outweighs the state’s involvement successful preventing fraud, protecting consumers from exploitation, and stabilizing the security market,” Walker wrote successful the ruling.

Lawmakers passed the security measurement connected April 30 amid spiraling property-insurance rates and insurers dropping policies successful Florida.

Citizens President and CEO Barry Gilway said helium was “not surprised, but disappointed” with Walker’s ruling.

“I recognize the logic down the order,” Gilway said. “But the bottommost enactment was, successful my opinion, the solicitation complaint is being driven substantially by the solicitation, and assertive solicitation of claims.”

The caller instrumentality besides takes steps to bounds lawyer fees and reduces the clip to record claims.

READ MORE: Child Tax Credit Latest: How To Use The IRS's Update Portal

The statute is viewed arsenic a 2nd caller legislative triumph for Citizens and the security industry.

In 2019, legislators placed restrictions connected policyholders being capable to motion implicit claims — known arsenic an duty of benefits — to contractors, who past prosecute outgo from insurers. Still, rates are going up and policies are speeding from backstage hands into the state-backed Citizens.

This year’s instrumentality raises Citizens’ 10 percent headdress connected yearly premium increases by 1 percent a twelvemonth implicit the adjacent 5 years to marque the state-backed insurer’s rates much competitory with backstage security coverage. The instrumentality besides requires Citizens to origin into its rates the reinsurance costs indispensable to support its surplus from a 1-in-100-year tempest and steers policyholders to backstage security carriers if a backstage argumentation premium is wrong 20 percent of a comparable Citizens argumentation premium.

Citizens officials noted Wednesday that authorities lawmakers could code Walker’s ruling during the 2022 legislative league that begins successful January. However, they acknowledged that immoderate affirmative signs different parts of the instrumentality are moving arsenic intended whitethorn not beryllium noticeable until aboriginal successful 2022.

“I cognize we’ll person data, hopefully successful the adjacent twelvemonth oregon so, to truly recognize the interaction of that connected the incoming barrage of litigation that we see,” said Christine Ashburn, Citizens’ main of communications, legislative and outer affairs.

In the lawsuit, Gale Force Roofing and Restoration said it advertises to homeowners to interaction the institution for inspections of tempest harm to roofs.

“Plaintiff (Gale Force Roofing and Restoration) volition past truthfully convey to homeowners the quality and grade of the damage,” the suit said. “Plaintiff volition past promote homeowners to interaction their security institution to marque a assertion nether their residential security argumentation and execute a declaration with plaintiff to delegate the benefits disposable nether the homeowner’s security argumentation to plaintiff.”

Gale Force argued that the instrumentality chills its First Amendment rights due to the fact that it forces the institution to halt its written advertizing that encourages consumers to interaction it for the intent of filing an security assertion for extortion damage.

The institution besides argued that the caller instrumentality is much astir reducing security claims than preventing fraud, saying the statute serves arsenic a “thinly veiled attempt” to support homeowners from getting extracurricular assistance successful making valid security claims for location repairs.

The bill’s supporters and insurance-industry officials, however, argued that questionable, if not fraudulent, roof-damage claims person played a large relation successful driving up costs.

In tribunal documents, attorneys representing the authorities disputed that the law’s restrictions interruption First Amendment rights, arguing that the “prohibited advertisement” proviso should beryllium considered a tenable regularisation connected commercialized code combating user exploitation and fraud.

But Walker disagreed.

While the authorities has the close to modulate contractors and support Floridians from fraud, Walker wrote successful Sunday’s order, “it indispensable bash truthful wrong the bounds acceptable by the Constitution.”

“Here, the Legislature failed to bash truthful accordingly,” the justice added.

MORE NEWS: Florida Board Of Education Approves New Standards

(©2021 CBS Local Media. All rights reserved. This worldly whitethorn not beryllium published, broadcast, rewritten, oregon redistributed. The News Service of Florida’s Jim Turner contributed to this report.)